Logo

Market response and future performance of inefficient investment: Over-investment or under-investment

Juniarti, and Christiawan, Yulius Jogi and Kwistianus, Hendri (2022) Market response and future performance of inefficient investment: Over-investment or under-investment. [UNSPECIFIED]

[img] PDF
Download (536Kb)
    [img] PDF
    Download (3675Kb)
      [img]
      Preview
      PDF (Korespondensi - Juniarti)
      Download (2597Kb) | Preview
        [img]
        Preview
        PDF (Paper - Juniarti)
        Download (3352Kb) | Preview
          [img]
          Preview
          PDF (Paper - Yulius )
          Download (3435Kb) | Preview

            Abstract

            There have been many studies on the market response to investment spending, but only a few have examined the market response to the issue of over-investment or under-investment. This study examines the effect of the issue on market response and future financial performance. The sample includes large-cap companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX) for 2016–2021. Samples must have at least 120 active trading days for each year. Two hundred and thirty-two observations meet the qualifications. This study adopts the investment inefficiency model developed by previous studies to measure over-investment or under-investment. Residual inefficient investment models are used as over-investment or under-investment scores, in addition to the dummy of the residual category. Market response is measured by cumulative abnormal returns (CAR), market capitalization (MCAP), and market-to-book value (MTB). Meanwhile, a firm’s performance uses return on assets (ROA) and return on equity (ROE). The results show that the coefficient of the inefficient investment variable, using both the residual value and the dummy variable, shows a negative direction, which means the market responds negatively to over-investment or under-investment. However, the value of t is significant at the <0.01 level on the market response variable as measured by MTB, but not significant for the other two proxies. Thus, hypothesis 1 is supported, although not for all market response proxies. The value of the inefficient investment coefficient also shows a negative direction when testing hypothesis 2 and is significant at the <0.1 level. These results are consistent with future performance variables measured by ROA and ROE.

            Item Type: UNSPECIFIED
            Uncontrolled Keywords: inefficient investment, over-investment, under-investment, financial performance, market response, big-cap companies
            Subjects: H Social Sciences > HF Commerce > HF5601 Accounting
            Divisions: Faculty of Economic > Accounting Department
            Depositing User: Admin
            Date Deposited: 16 Nov 2022 17:35
            Last Modified: 22 Aug 2023 11:54
            URI: https://repository.petra.ac.id/id/eprint/19765

            Actions (login required)

            View Item